CLEAN : Defence continues in French breast implant

The transcript discusses the mockery directed at the tribunal and the lack of accountability in a case involving non-homologated products. It highlights the blame placed on Xavier Bertrand for the risks taken and questions why the gel was not approved. The discussion includes clinical evidence of injuries caused by the product, emphasizing the need for proper regulation and homologation.

What is the main theme of the first section of the transcript?

• The importance of honesty in court.

• The disregard for others and blame-shifting.

• The process of product approval.

• The clinical evidence of harm.

What is the primary concern discussed in the second section?

• The lack of product approval and its safety.

• The role of the judicial system.

• The financial implications of product distribution.

• The testimonies of victims.

Who is mentioned as a competent and financial individual in the transcript?

• Xavier Bertrand

• M. Kouti

• A victim of the gel

• A court official

What evidence is presented in the third section regarding the gel?

• Judicial rulings

• Financial reports

• Clinical observations and victim testimonies

• Product approval certificates

What is the observed effect of the gel on victims?

• It is beneficial for their joints.

• It circulates in their body causing harm.

• It improves their health.

• It has no effect.