Senator McConnell says Kavanaugh opposers cherry picked arguments for confirmation hearing

The Washington Post fact-checker criticized a Democratic senator for misrepresenting Judge Kavanaugh's testimony. The senator cherry-picked Kavanaugh's paraphrased argument, presenting it as his personal opinion. This misrepresentation inadvertently highlighted Kavanaugh's skill in considering diverse perspectives. The attacks on Kavanaugh were baseless and revealed more about the senators' motives. Ultimately, Kavanaugh's qualifications impressed those who listened fairly, and a vote to confirm him is anticipated.

What did the Washington Post fact-checker criticize a Democratic senator for?

• Supporting Judge Kavanaugh's nomination

• Ignoring Judge Kavanaugh's qualifications

• Misrepresenting Judge Kavanaugh's testimony

• Agreeing with Judge Kavanaugh's personal opinions

How did the Democratic senator misrepresent Judge Kavanaugh's testimony?

• By ignoring his legal record

• By supporting his views

• By praising his skills

• By quoting him out of context

What skill of Judge Kavanaugh is highlighted by the Democrats' attempt to discredit him?

• His legal record

• His political affiliations

• His strong personal beliefs

• His ability to engage with diverse views

What do the attacks on Judge Kavanaugh reveal about the senators?

• Their support for Judge Kavanaugh

• Their impartiality in the confirmation process

• Their willingness to appease far-left interests

• Their understanding of legal matters

What was the general impression of those who listened to Judge Kavanaugh's testimony?

• They were impressed with his qualifications

• They were critical of his legal record

• They were indifferent to his skills

• They were supportive of the attacks against him