Senator Schumer challenges if Kavanaugh neutral arbiter if confirmed to Supreme Court

The transcript discusses concerns about a partisan attorney's impartiality, highlighting his involvement in major legal battles and truthfulness to a congressional committee. It emphasizes the Senate's duty to ensure judicial impartiality, especially at the Supreme Court level, to prevent partisanship. Senators are urged to scrutinize Judge Kavanaugh's testimony for truthfulness, as misleading testimony should heavily influence confirmation decisions.

What is the main concern about the attorney's involvement in legal battles?

• His impartiality

• His lack of experience

• His financial status

• His educational background

Why is it important for the Senate to ensure judicial impartiality?

• To maintain the court's legitimacy

• To improve the court's efficiency

• To reduce the workload of the court

• To increase the number of judges

What could happen if the Supreme Court is seen as an extension of congressional partisanship?

• It would gain more power

• It would become more efficient

• It would have fewer cases to handle

• Its rulings might be viewed as illegitimate

What should senators consider when voting on a nominee?

• The nominee's financial background

• The nominee's educational qualifications

• The truthfulness of the nominee's testimony

• The nominee's popularity

What is the implication of providing false testimony to a committee?

• It should weigh heavily on the decision to confirm or reject

• It should be celebrated

• It should be lightly considered

• It should be ignored