Military left without IVF coverage as Congress secures fertility benefits

The video discusses the debate over whether US military personnel should receive government-funded IVF coverage. Currently, service members must prove fertility issues are service-related to get coverage. The financial burden of IVF is significant, with costs reaching up to $45,000. Some Congress members oppose expanding coverage due to costs and ethical concerns, while others argue it's unfair for Congress to have such benefits while denying them to military personnel. The military's recruitment and retention could benefit from expanded coverage. The House passed a defense bill without IVF expansion, and the Senate will review it next.

How do supporters of expanding IVF care view its impact on the overall health of the armed forces?

What is the total defense spending bill for 2025, and how does it relate to the proposed IVF expansion for military members?