The 'Friends' Seeking to Influence U.S. Courts

The video discusses a lawsuit involving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, highlighting the role of 'friends of the court' who submit briefs to influence court decisions. These entities, not directly involved in the case, can sway outcomes, raising concerns about transparency and potential lobbying. The prevalence of such practices in the US Supreme Court and federal appeals courts is surprising to many experts. The video also touches on the ethical implications and the ongoing nature of these legal battles.

What is the role of a 'friend of the court' in legal proceedings?

How many cases related to Fannie Mae have been accepted as providing friends of the court briefs?

What concerns do experts have regarding the influence of billionaire investors in court cases?

What was the reaction of scholars and practitioners when asked about irregularities in court cases?

What are the implications of the ongoing legal battles for investors in Fannie Mae?