The scandal that shook psychology to its core

The video discusses the replication crisis in psychology, highlighting the challenges of replicating studies and the implications for scientific credibility. It explores the role of statistical methods, particularly P-values, and the impact of publication bias. The video suggests solutions like open science and preregistration to improve research transparency and reliability. It concludes with a hopeful outlook on the future of psychology, emphasizing the importance of replication in strengthening scientific knowledge.

What was the main finding of Darrell Bem's ten-year study?

How did the Reproducibility Project Psychology contribute to the understanding of the replication crisis?

What is the significance of the P value in psychological research?

What are some of the consequences of the publication bias in psychology?

What are questionable research practices, and how do they affect research outcomes?

What role does transparency play in improving psychological research?

In what ways has the replication crisis affected public confidence in science?

How can preregistration and registered reports improve the quality of psychological research?

What changes are suggested to address the replication crisis in psychology?

Why is replication considered essential in the scientific process?