CLEAN : Pistorius risks 15 years in jail after murder conviction

The transcript discusses a legal case involving a judge's decision on a trial. It questions whether the verdict of culpable homicide was appropriate based on the evidence and witness testimonies. There is a debate on whether historians should have been convicted, and the case is referred back to the High Court for further judgment and sentencing.

How does the text suggest the trial should be referred back to?

What does the text imply about the judgments made in the High Court?