Jacob Rees Mogg interview on Boris Johnson allegations

The video discusses the role of private prosecutions in ensuring the law is accessible to all, not just the state. It raises concerns about criminal prosecutions being used to suppress freedom of speech, particularly in the context of those who lost a referendum using financial means to silence opposing arguments, which is seen as anti-democratic.

What concerns are raised about private prosecutions in the context of democracy?

How do private prosecutions demonstrate the availability of law to individuals?

What implications does the use of money to suppress arguments have on democratic processes?

In what ways can freedom of speech be argued in the context of criminal prosecutions?

What role do individuals play in the context of private prosecutions according to the text?