CLEAN : Kenya jails British terror suspect for forgery

The video discusses a legal case involving concurrent sentences. It explains the concept of concurrent sentencing, where multiple sentences are served simultaneously if offenses are related. The client's dissatisfaction with the ruling is highlighted, and the possibility of appealing to higher courts is mentioned. The judge sentenced Grant to one year for each of the nine counts, but Grant maintains his innocence.

What were the findings regarding the fairness of the case?

What are the avenues available to proceed to higher courts?

What was the sentence given to Grant for each count?

What does Grant believe about his innocence?

What is the significance of concurrent sentences in legal terms?