Jeremy Corbyn Reacts to Syria Strikes

The transcript discusses the lack of parliamentary consultation before military strikes, questioning the legal basis and urging for transparency. It highlights the need for UN involvement and a new resolution to address the Syrian conflict. The speaker warns against unilateral actions without legal backing, emphasizing the role of the UN as a mediator. The humanitarian justification for the strikes is debated, with historical precedents cited as alternatives. The legality of the bombing is questioned, focusing on the absence of a direct threat to justify self-defense.

What humanitarian argument was presented in favor of the airstrikes?

What precedent is mentioned regarding the destruction of chemical weapons?