CLEAN : Japan says to try again with 'scientific' whaling programme

The video discusses the often political and emotional nature of scientific discussions within the International Whaling Commission, influenced by governmental positions. It highlights the flexibility of the research plan, which can be improved or amended during discussions. The speaker emphasizes the importance of responding to recommendations sincerely and in good faith, and anticipates how these will be received by the scientific community.

In what manner should responses to recommendations be made?

What role does the scientific community play in the development of the research plan?