Can the President be indicted? Constitutionally speaking?

The video explores the constitutional question of whether a president can be indicted. It discusses the lack of Supreme Court precedent and presents arguments for and against indictment. The 'no' side cites the Unitarian executive approach and the potential national disruption, while the 'yes' side argues the Constitution does not grant immunity and references cases like Nixon vs US and Clinton vs Jones. The video concludes with the idea that justice should prevail, questioning if a president is above the law.

What alternative to indictment is suggested for dealing with a president who has committed crimes while in office?

How does the Supreme Court ruling in Nixon versus US relate to the idea of presidential accountability?

What is the significance of the Clinton versus Jones case in the context of presidential legal proceedings?