New Utah Law Requires Fathers To Pay For Half Of Pregnancy Costs

A state initiative aims to cover half of women's pregnancy expenses, marking a first in the nation. Governor Spencer Cox hopes this will reduce abortions by providing financial aid. However, critics argue that the costs of raising a child far exceed pregnancy expenses and that the measure fails to address domestic violence issues.

What financial support does the state provide for women's pregnancy expenses?

What is the hope of Republican Governor Spencer Cox regarding this measure?

What do critics say about the costs of raising a child compared to pregnancy expenses?

Why might this measure be seen as insufficient by some critics?

In what situations do critics argue that this measure does not protect women?