Fani Willis must cut ties with prosecutor or step down from Trump case

Fani Willis must cut ties with prosecutor or step down from Trump case

Assessment

Interactive Video

Social Studies

University

Hard

Created by

Quizizz Content

FREE Resource

The transcript discusses a legal case in Georgia involving racketeering and election subversion. The judge ruled that District Attorney Fonnie Willis can remain on the case if she cuts ties with her special prosecutor, Nathan Wade, due to a conflict of interest. This decision is significant as it prevents potential delays or dismissal of the case. The background of the case includes allegations of a romantic relationship between Willis and Wade, which led to calls for her disqualification. The judge emphasized the need for evidence of conflict for disqualification. The case involves multiple defendants, including former President Donald Trump.

Read more

7 questions

Show all answers

1.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What was the judge's ruling regarding District Attorney Fonnie Willis's ability to stay on the case?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

2.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What stipulation did the judge impose on Fonnie Willis for her to continue prosecuting the case?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

3.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What challenges would have arisen if the District Attorney was disqualified from the case?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

4.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What relationship led to the request for disqualification of Fonnie Willis?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

5.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What was the significance of the testimony given by Fonnie Willis regarding her relationship with Nathan Wade?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

6.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What evidence did Judge Scott McAfee mention as necessary for disqualification?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF

7.

OPEN ENDED QUESTION

3 mins • 1 pt

What implications does the judge's ruling have for the future of the case?

Evaluate responses using AI:

OFF