Think White Paper Was Wrongly Worded: Midgley

The video discusses the unprecedented level of civil disobedience in Hong Kong, focusing on the legal and political aspects of protests. It highlights the authorities' response, including the use of tear gas, and the subsequent public reaction. The discussion also delves into the role of Basic Law, the implications of a controversial white paper, and the independence of the judiciary. The video concludes with a reflection on the importance of language in legal documents and the ongoing demand for universal suffrage.

What is the irony mentioned in relation to the Basic Law and the protests?

How does the speaker feel about the wording of the White Paper and its impact on the protests?