Exceptions to the Parol Evidence Rule

The video tutorial explains the parole evidence rule, which excludes prior and contemporaneous communications from court consideration when interpreting contract terms. It outlines exceptions where extrinsic evidence is allowed, such as showing partial integration, resolving ambiguities, or demonstrating fraud. The tutorial emphasizes that these exceptions can override the rule, allowing courts to consider outside evidence in specific situations.

What is the parole evidence rule and how does it affect the consideration of prior communications in contract interpretation?

What are the exceptions to the parole evidence rule that allow for the introduction of extrinsic evidence?

How can extrinsic evidence demonstrate that a contract is a partial integration rather than a complete integration?

In what situations might a court allow extrinsic evidence to resolve ambiguities in a contract?

What types of issues can extrinsic evidence address that may affect a party's ability to enter into a contract knowingly?