Supreme Court sends Trump case back to lower court, giving former president limited immunity

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on presidential immunity, with justices voting along ideological lines. The decision states that presidents are entitled to immunity for official acts but not for unofficial ones. The case is remanded to the lower court to determine the nature of the acts in question. The burden of proof lies with the special counsel and DOJ to show any legal violations by the former president, who faces federal charges. The Chief Justice emphasized the separation of powers, while liberal justices dissented. The case will continue in lower courts.

What implications does the Supreme Court's decision have for the lower court's proceedings?

How does the Chief Justice's opinion differentiate between official and unofficial acts of the president?