Jeremy Corbyn interview at Anti Pinochet rally 2000

The transcript discusses the ongoing legal proceedings involving Pinochet, highlighting the application for a new hearing in the Divisional Court. It emphasizes the need for transparency in the process and critiques the influence of Pinochet's refusal to undergo medical examinations. The text also covers Belgium's efforts to extradite individuals for torture crimes and the potential for other countries like Switzerland, France, and Spain to follow suit. Additionally, it addresses the challenges faced in prosecuting Pinochet in Chile due to constitutional immunity and the lack of political will to amend the Constitution.

What are the implications of the lack of openness in the legal process regarding Pinochet?

What is the significance of Belgium's actions regarding extradition for crimes of torture?

What role does the Director of Public Prosecution play in the case against Pinochet?

Discuss the challenges faced in prosecuting General Pinochet in Chile.

How does the Constitution of 1990 affect Pinochet's legal immunity?