Michelle Donelan apologises for making Hamas damages claim on social media

The speaker addresses a recent issue involving a tweet by an EDI board member under UKRI, which led to concerns about the appointment process. After working with officials and legal teams, a letter was sent to UKRI for investigation. The tweet was later clarified, and the speaker withdrew concerns, settling the case for £15,000 to avoid legal costs. The speaker reflects on the situation, acknowledging a lack of confidentiality and apologizes for any distraction caused.

What was the overall intention of the speaker in addressing the situation?

What could have been done differently regarding the letter sent to UKRI?