Apple Brings Up Code in Fight With FBI

The video discusses Apple's legal defense against the government's demand to create software to unlock an iPhone used in a criminal case. Apple argues that writing software is a form of speech and that the government cannot compel it to do so. The case draws on a 1990s precedent where code was considered speech. The case is expected to progress through various legal and public forums, potentially reaching the Supreme Court. The outcome could set a significant precedent for future cases involving software and compelled speech.

What is the main argument that Apple is making regarding software and speech?

What precedent was set in the 1990s regarding code and speech?

What are the potential next steps in the legal process for Apple?

How does Apple view the government's request to create new software?

What implications could the outcome of this case have for other companies?