Regulation Scholar: At Least, China and the US Are Talking

The video discusses the ongoing tensions between the US and China regarding AI technology, focusing on digital surveillance and ideological differences. It highlights the EU's proactive approach to AI regulation, particularly the AI Act, and the challenges posed by generative AI technologies. The Brussels Effect is examined, illustrating how EU regulations set global standards. The video concludes with a discussion on the importance of collaborative governance involving tech companies and governments to ensure effective AI regulation.

What are the fundamental differences between the US and China regarding AI?

What are the concerns regarding China's use of AI for digital surveillance?

How does the EU approach AI regulation compared to the US?

What implications does the EU AI Act have for innovation and regulation?

How do large language models pose risks in AI applications?

What role do tech companies play in the governance of AI according to the discussion?

What challenges does the EU face in legislating AI effectively?