Former sodium valproate patient reacts to review of failings after 'long haul' for acknowledgement

The speaker reflects on the challenges faced during a review process, initially feeling relieved by the involvement of experts but soon realizing the significant workload they had to undertake. The review aimed to address systemic flaws in organizations like the MHRA and GMC. The speaker criticizes the expectation placed on individuals to fix governmental systems and highlights the exhaustion it causes. They stress the importance of responsibility and proactivity among clinicians and scientists, urging them to engage more effectively with their organizations and take necessary actions.

What was the initial reaction of the speaker regarding the review process?

What challenges did the speaker face during the review process?

What is the speaker's opinion on the effectiveness of apologies in the context of the review?

How does the speaker feel about the role of clinicians in the review process?

What does the speaker believe should be the responsibility of doctors and neurologists?