VOICED : Thai protest leader a saviour or crimina

The transcript discusses a protest leader who is popular among anti-government protesters. He accuses the Prime Minister of corruption and being a puppet of her brother. Despite his own controversial past and legal issues, he remains a key figure in the movement. His transformation includes a vow not to take power if successful, and he remains defiant despite attacks. Critics view him as undemocratic, aiming to replace the government with an unelected council. The leader is seen as a divisive figure, with some accusing him of being a puppet himself.

What are the implications of the leader's declaration not to take power if his movement is successful?

In what ways is the leader described as a divisive figure in the political landscape?