Bayer Loses Third Roundup Trial

The video discusses the legal pressure on a company to settle lawsuits related to a product, Roundup, which is claimed to be safe by both the company and the US EPA. However, public opinion and jury reactions suggest otherwise, as evidenced by a juror's comment about drinking the product. The company faces challenges in both legal and public opinion arenas.

What was the outcome of the three cases mentioned in the text?

What pressure is mentioned regarding the couple suing in the case?

What did a juror express a desire to see the lawyer do?

How does the US EPA's stance on Roundup compare to that of Bayer?

What does the text suggest about Bayer's standing in the court of public opinion?