Should Apple Unlock the Terrorist's i-Phone?

The video discusses the conflict between Apple and the federal government over unlocking an iPhone belonging to Syed Farook, a San Bernardino shooter. The government wants Apple to create a backdoor to access the phone, citing the All Writs Act of 1789. Apple argues this sets a dangerous precedent for privacy and security. The video explores legal, technical, and ethical implications, as well as public and political reactions, including calls for boycotts. It concludes by questioning whether this is a legitimate use of the All Writs Act or a threat to privacy.

What was the main issue discussed regarding the iPhone and the federal government?

How does the Judiciary Act of 1789 relate to the government's request to access the iPhone?

What concerns did Apple express regarding the creation of a backdoor for the iPhone?

What precedent was mentioned in relation to the All Writs Act and accessing a phone?

What are the implications of the government's actions on privacy and data security?