Sherman Act Refusal to Deal

The video discusses the Sherman Act, focusing on anti-competitive behaviors like boycotts by market competitors. It explains how intent plays a role in determining whether actions are evaluated under per se illegality or the rule of reason. Examples illustrate how collaborations can be legal if they have pro-competitive justifications, despite potential anti-competitive effects.

What is the primary requirement of the Sherman Act in relation to trade?

How can a collaboration between competitors be considered anti-competitive?

What factors do the FTC or courts consider when evaluating a situation under the rule of reason?

What is the significance of intent in determining the legality of competitive practices?

In what scenario might a combination or buying agreement not fall under per se illegality?