Credibility and Experience

The transcript discusses the challenges judges face in relying on expert evidence, highlighting potential biases and the risk of injustice. It emphasizes the importance of expert credibility and presentation in court, noting that judges may form tentative views based on familiarity with certain experts. The discussion also covers the difficulties experts face in courtroom settings, including misconceptions about the adversarial system and the impact of juror perceptions, which often favor experience over qualifications.

What are some reservations judges might have regarding the reliability of expert evidence?

How does a judge's familiarity with certain experts influence their acceptance of evidence?

What impact does the credibility of a witness have on the assessment of their evidence?

What are the challenges faced by experts who are less known in the courtroom?

In what ways can a lack of experience in presenting evidence affect an expert's performance in court?

How important is it for an expert witness to establish their expertise in a specific area?

What factors should be considered when structuring the presentation of evidence?