Fighting Words and the 1st Amendment

The video discusses the concept of 'fighting words,' which are words that can incite immediate violence or disruption. It explains that the context and immediacy are crucial in determining whether speech can be prohibited. While offensive speech in a public setting may lead to violence and thus be restricted, the same speech on digital platforms like YouTube or Twitter is protected as free speech if it doesn't incite immediate violence.

Discuss the implications of prohibiting speech in a public setting versus online platforms.

What criteria determine whether speech is protected as free speech or considered fighting words?