Apple Says Court Order Violates Constitutional Rights

The transcript discusses Apple's response to an FBI court order, which Apple claims violates their constitutional rights. Apple plans to fight the order publicly and through Congress, arguing it sets a dangerous precedent. The FBI cites legal precedents, but Apple disputes this, highlighting the broader implications for the tech industry. The case is expected to spark a national debate and legislative action.

What are the constitutional rights that Apple claims would be violated by the court order?

How does Tim Cook feel about the lack of dialogue with the administration before the Justice Department's action?

What precedent does Apple argue does not exist in relation to the FBI's request?

What is the significance of the All Writs Act in the context of this case?

In what ways does this case represent a larger national debate beyond just the FBI's request for one phone?