Grenfell Tower as inquiry hears from Arconic managing director

The transcript discusses a person involved in financial transactions with RBC leaders, highlighting a payment of £250,000. It mentions a legal judgment that was overturned, indicating the person got the law wrong despite having a commercial law background. The discussion suggests the person should have been aware of the legal implications due to their expertise.

What was the amount paid to the individual by RBC leaders of the Council?

What was determined about the market's judgment?

What was the conclusion about the individual's understanding of the law?

What background does the individual have in relation to the law?

Who is referred to as the victim in the context of the discussion?