Federal Appeals Court Rules 'Remain In Mexico' Policy Is Invalid

The Remain in Mexico policy, implemented by the Trump administration in January 2019, required asylum seekers to wait in Mexico for their US immigration hearings. Intended to reduce border crossings and detention overcrowding, it has faced criticism for endangering migrants, many of whom live in unsafe conditions. A court ruled the policy invalid, citing inconsistency with federal law. Additional measures have been introduced to make seeking asylum more difficult, including requiring applications in transit countries.

What was the purpose of the Trump administration's remain in Mexico policy?

How many people have been sent to Mexico to await their trials according to US Customs and Border Protection?

What risks do critics associate with the remain in Mexico policy for asylum seekers?

What did the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decide regarding the remain in Mexico policy?

What measures has the administration implemented to make it harder for asylum seekers to apply for protections?