TED-ED: Is there a reproducibility crisis in science? - Matt Anticole

In 2011, physicists reported neutrinos traveling faster than light, later found to be a mistake due to a faulty cable. This highlights the importance of confidence in scientific results, as errors can lead to wasted resources. Reproducibility is a challenge, with many studies failing to replicate. Systematic issues, like the pressure to publish significant results, contribute to this problem. Efforts are underway to improve reproducibility by making data more accessible and strengthening peer review. Addressing these issues is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge.

What are some potential consequences of publishing results that are not reproducible?

How can the peer-review process be improved to enhance the reproducibility of scientific research?