Neuroimpulsivity?

The video discusses the use of neuroscience in courtrooms, particularly in criminal cases, to explain defendants' behaviors. It highlights how defendants introduce neuroscience evidence to argue reduced responsibility due to brain abnormalities. An example is given of a defendant using a brain injury defense to claim impulsivity and lack of premeditation. The video also explores different types of defenses, such as arguing involuntariness due to brain damage, and the implications of these defenses in legal contexts.

What distinctions are made between premeditated homicide and impulsive actions in legal defenses?

In what ways can brain damage affect a person's legal responsibility for their actions?