Unilateral action to halt Brexit checks would be ‘unlawful’ – Michelle O’Neill

The transcript discusses the ongoing controversy regarding checks at ports, which are deemed unlawful without executive approval. Edwin Poots is expected to bring a paper to the executive for approval. The legal responsibilities of ministers and the need for protocol implementation are emphasized. Political dynamics, including the DUP's stance and past attempts to halt checks, are explored. The Permanent Secretary's role in ensuring compliance is highlighted, along with the challenges of navigating political and legal obligations.

What is the significance of the paper being brought forward by Edwin Poots?

What are the implications if the executive decides by a majority to continue the checks?

Explain the legal responsibilities of Edwin Poots regarding the checks mentioned.

Discuss the challenges faced by the DUP in the context of the Brexit debate as mentioned in the text.

What actions did Edwin Poots attempt previously regarding the checks, and what was the outcome?