Sally Yates and James Clapper appear before the Senate Judicial Subcommittee

The transcript discusses electronic surveillance on foreign intelligence targets and the involvement of US persons. It explains the necessity of unmasking under Section 702 of the FISA Amendment Act. The speaker addresses a committee, discussing the handling of classified information and clarifying that non-disclosure should not imply confirmation of collusion. The importance of understanding the context and limitations of intelligence sharing is emphasized.

What is the purpose of unmasking in the context of electronic surveillance?

What does section 702 of the FISA Amendment Act pertain to?

What was the context of the letter dated November 18, 2016, mentioned in the text?

Why did the speaker decline to answer questions about evidence of collusion?

What clarification did the speaker make regarding the inability to answer certain questions?