CLEAN : Protesters demand Thai PMs resignation as APEC summit kicks off

The transcript discusses the illegitimacy of the current Prime Minister, criticizing his leadership and suggesting that he does not represent the people. It argues that if an election were held, he would not retain his position. The speaker urges others not to legitimize his role by participating in meetings that support him. The transcript concludes with unrelated remarks.

What is the significance of the phrase 'tyrannical history' in the context of the Prime Minister?

What message is being conveyed about the Prime Minister's legitimacy?

What does the speaker imply about the Prime Minister's representation of the people?

What would happen if an election were held tomorrow according to the speaker?

How does the speaker feel about the meeting being held?