INTERVIEW: Gerardo Naranjo on the difficulty of filming in Mexico

The speaker addresses criticism of their movie, which some perceive as a negative statement about Mexico. They clarify that the film's message is about unity and a spiritual revolution, not politics. The speaker expresses concern over the loss of national identity and fraternity, emphasizing that the movie is not a political statement but a personal exploration of societal issues.

What is the filmmaker's reaction to the criticism that his movie is a negative statement towards Mexico?

• He agrees with the criticism.

• He is surprised and believes his intentions are misunderstood.

• He apologizes for the misunderstanding.

• He decides to make a sequel to clarify his stance.

What does the filmmaker hope to convey through his movie?

• A focus on the government's role in societal issues.

• A message of despair and hopelessness.

• A need for a spiritual revolution and unity among people.

• A call for a political revolution.

According to the filmmaker, what has Mexico lost?

• Its sense of fraternity and national identity.

• Its political influence.

• Its economic stability.

• Its cultural heritage.

What is the filmmaker's stance on making political statements?

• He avoids discussing politics entirely.

• He is passionate about political activism.

• He finds them superfluous and prefers to focus on deeper issues.

• He believes they are essential.

How does the filmmaker view his movie in terms of personal expression?

• As a means to entertain without deeper meaning.

• As a way to gain political influence.

• As a form of personal therapy to express his concerns.

• As a commercial venture.