Anjem Choudary Interview About his Trial

The transcript discusses the boundaries of freedom of speech, particularly in relation to supporting terrorist organizations like the Islamic State. The speaker defends their past speeches, arguing they have remained within legal limits and have been consistent over decades. The legal nuances of expressing support versus inviting support for a terrorist group are explored, with references to historical legal precedents. The speaker emphasizes the importance of freedom of expression and challenges the legal accusations against them.

What is the main concern regarding freedom of speech as discussed in the text?

How does the speaker differentiate between expressing an opinion and inviting support for a terrorist organization?

In what way does the speaker claim to have maintained compliance with the law over the years?

What historical context does the speaker provide regarding the legislation on inviting support?

What implications does the speaker suggest the current case has for freedom of expression?