Dangerous Extrapolations

The video discusses how perceptions of the past are shaped by archaeological findings and the importance of resisting conclusions based on incomplete evidence. It highlights the challenges in archaeology, such as determining whether observed contrasts are real or due to limited samples. The video compares findings from Herculaneum and Pompeii, emphasizing the dangers of assumptions. It also describes the suburban baths in Herculaneum and the explicit graffiti found there, cautioning against interpreting absence of evidence as evidence of absence.

What challenges do archaeologists face when interpreting findings from sites like Herculaneum and Pompeii?

How might the excavation of different areas in Herculaneum affect our understanding of its similarities or differences with Pompeii?

Discuss the implications of not finding certain types of evidence, such as brothels or graffiti, in archaeological sites.

What does the presence of explicit graffiti in the suburban baths of Herculaneum suggest about the social dynamics of the time?

Why is it important to be cautious when interpreting archaeological evidence, particularly in relation to assumptions about missing artifacts?