Tory MP strongly questions blackmail allegations

The speaker discusses the absence of a direct link between their behavior in Parliament and the allocation of resources to their constituency, contrasting this with American political practices. They reflect on their 16 years of experience, noting that political influence does not operate as it might in 'House of Cards'. The speaker expresses curiosity about the differences and acknowledges that while some aspects of politics ring true, others do not align with their experiences.

What does the speaker suggest about the relationship between parliamentary behavior and constituency resources?

• There is a direct link.

• It varies by region.

• There is no direct link.

• It depends on the political party.

How does the speaker compare their experience to American politics?

• They see no similarities.

• They believe American politics has a direct link between behavior and resources.

• They think American politics is less transparent.

• They find it very similar.

What does the speaker wish for in terms of political behavior and constituency benefits?

• A system that is more like American politics.

• A system with no rewards or punishments.

• A system where bad behavior is punished.

• A system where good behavior leads to financial rewards.

How long has the speaker been involved in politics?

• 10 years

• 16 years

• 20 years

• 25 years

What is the speaker's overall stance on the idea of political behavior influencing resources?

• They fully support it.

• They believe it is essential.

• They are indifferent.

• They are skeptical about it.