Michelle O’Neill: UK Government acted in extreme bad faith over Northern Ireland Protocol

The transcript discusses the British Government's unreliability in negotiations, its stance against public opinion and international law, and the implications of its actions on Brexit. It highlights a recent joint committee meeting focused on protocol commitment and resolution, emphasizing the need for continued dialogue. The government's recent actions are seen as a solo run, demonstrating bad faith and increasing uncertainty.

How is the British Government perceived in terms of trustworthiness and reliability?

• As highly trustworthy and reliable

• As overly cautious and careful

• As untrustworthy and unreliable

• As neutral and indifferent

What was the purpose of the recent joint committee meeting?

• To finalize the Brexit deal

• To discuss military strategies

• To find resolutions to existing issues

• To plan a new trade agreement

What was the commitment made during the joint committee meeting?

• To dissolve the committee

• To increase tariffs

• To abandon the protocol

• To define solutions and allow the process to continue

How are the British Government's recent actions described?

• As a well-planned strategy

• As a demonstration of good faith

• As a solo run showing bad faith

• As a collaborative effort

What is the impact of the British Government's recent actions on Brexit?

• It has clarified the Brexit process

• It has led to more uncertainty

• It has strengthened international relations

• It has resolved all issues