Court Rules NSA Mass Surveillance Program Was Illegal

The NSA's secret collection of Americans' phone records without warrants was deemed illegal by a court, potentially violating the Constitution. Initially denied by top intelligence officials, the program was justified as a tool against domestic extremism. Edward Snowden, who exposed these activities in 2013, fled to Russia and faces espionage charges. He expressed surprise at the court's condemnation of the NSA and acknowledgment of his role. The American Civil Liberties Union hailed the ruling as a win for privacy rights.

What was the initial stance of top intelligence officials regarding the NSA's surveillance activities?

• They blamed it on a third party.

• They said it was a mistake.

• They claimed it was not happening.

• They admitted to it immediately.

What was the court's opinion on the NSA's surveillance program?

• It was completely legal.

• It was necessary for national security.

• It may have violated the Constitution.

• It was a minor infraction.

Where did Edward Snowden flee to after exposing the NSA's activities?

• Germany

• Russia

• China

• Canada

How did Edward Snowden react to the court's ruling on the NSA's activities?

• He was unaware of the ruling.

• He was disappointed.

• He was surprised and pleased.

• He was indifferent.

What was the American Civil Liberties Union's perspective on the court's decision?

• It was a setback for privacy rights.

• It was a victory for privacy rights.

• It was a neutral decision.

• It was irrelevant to privacy rights.