Arlene Forster Comments on Investigation into Energy Scheme Scandal

The speaker explains that the investigation was previously stalled because they refused to step aside, fearing it would imply guilt. Now, no longer holding the position of first Minister, this obstacle is removed, allowing inquiries to proceed and addressing the issues at hand.

What was the main reason the speaker did not want to step aside during the investigation?

• They wanted to maintain control.

• They were advised by their legal team.

• They were confident of their innocence.

• They believed it would imply guilt.

What change in the speaker's position allowed the investigation to proceed?

• They stepped down as the first Minister.

• They received public support.

• They were cleared of all charges.

• They were re-elected.

What does the speaker suggest should happen now that the obstacle is removed?

• The inquiries should be re-evaluated.

• The inquiries should be set up immediately.

• The inquiries should be delayed further.

• The inquiries should be canceled.

Why does the speaker believe there is no reason to delay the inquiries?

• The leadership has changed.

• The public demands it.

• The issues are no longer relevant.

• The obstacle has been removed.

What is the speaker's attitude towards dealing with the issues at hand?

• Uncertain

• Indifferent

• Proactive

• Resistant