CLEAN : High Court rules UK parliament must vote on Brexit 4

The transcript discusses a legal proceeding where the Prime Minister criticized the claimant for allegedly subverting democracy. The claimant defends their actions as a constitutional right to seek court protection against unlawful government actions. The court has granted this protection, and the claimant hopes for respect of the court's decision, allowing Parliament to decide on the Article 50 notice.

What was the Prime Minister's accusation against the speaker?

• Ignoring court decisions

• Trying to subvert democracy

• Misleading the public

• Supporting unlawful actions

What did the speaker claim as their constitutional right?

• To support the Prime Minister

• To ignore parliamentary decisions

• To seek court protection

• To criticize the government

What was the outcome of the court proceedings for the speaker?

• The court provided protection

• The court supported the government

• The court fined the speaker

• The court dismissed the case

What does the speaker hope for after the court's decision?

• That the Prime Minister will resign

• That the decision will be respected

• That the public will protest

• That the government will appeal

What is the next step the speaker mentions after the court's decision?

• Parliament will make a decision on Article 50

• The speaker will file another lawsuit

• The Prime Minister will issue a statement

• The court will review the decision