CLEAN : Pistorius trial to begin amid blaze of pub

The video discusses the rare circumstances under which preemptive action can be justified, particularly when the threat is not clearly identifiable. It analyzes a significant legal judgment that sets a precedent for open justice, emphasizing the importance of state-provided evidence. The judgment is celebrated as a victory for transparency in the legal system.

What might be the significance of the phrase 'the Crunch will be whether he'll be able to give' in legal contexts?

In what ways can the phrase 'possibly through within the confines of whatever has been proven by the state' be interpreted?