PandoDailys Sarah Lacy Responds to Uber

The transcript discusses Uber's misuse of customer data and executive Emil Michael's controversial remarks about targeting journalists. Sarah Lacy, a journalist, shares her experience of being threatened by Uber, highlighting the company's toxic culture and lack of accountability. The conversation explores the broader implications of Uber's actions on journalism, privacy, and corporate ethics.

What was the main allegation against Uber regarding its treatment of journalists?

What was the response from Uber regarding the access to customer data?

How did Emil Michael suggest Uber should handle journalists who are unfriendly to the company?

What measures did Sarah Lacy take for her personal security after the threats?

How did the public and investors react to the allegations against Uber?

What concerns did Sarah Lacy raise about the treatment of women in relation to Uber's company culture?

What did Sarah Lacy express about the culture within Uber?

What is the significance of the HP Pretexting scandal in relation to the current situation with Uber?

What parallels did Sarah Lacy draw between Uber's actions and political campaign tactics?

What did Sarah Lacy say about the potential consequences of Emil Michael's comments?