Comics in High Court to Support Twitter Joke

The video discusses the case of Paul Chambers, who was convicted for sending a menacing tweet about blowing up an airport. The tweet was deemed a non-credible threat but led to his arrest and conviction, raising questions about freedom of expression and the applicability of outdated laws to social media. The case highlights the tension between legal frameworks and technological advancements, with significant implications for social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook.

In what ways does the case highlight the challenges of applying old laws to modern technology?

What implications does this case have for social media and the laws governing it?