CLEAN : Paradise Papers: Jersey regrets irresponsible reporting

The transcript discusses the negative impact of sensationalized reporting on the island's reputation, potentially affecting tourism. It also touches on the legal but morally questionable practice of profit shifting by Apple to Jersey, and the potential for regulatory changes.

What was the main criticism of the reporting discussed in the first section?

• It was too detailed.

• It was sensationalized.

• It was too brief.

• It was supportive.

How does the reporting affect the island's image according to the second section?

• It casts a negative light on the island.

• It promotes tourism.

• It has no effect on the island.

• It enhances the island's beauty.

What is the potential impact of the reporting on tourism?

• It will have no impact on tourism.

• It will increase the number of tourists.

• It will discourage people from visiting.

• It will make the island more popular.

What is the legal status of Apple's profit shifting to Jersey?

• It is partially legal.

• It is under investigation.

• It is perfectly legal.

• It is illegal.

What might happen if Jersey decides to address the public's concerns about Apple's activities?

• Apple will face legal action.

• Apple will shift its operations elsewhere.

• Apple will stop its operations.

• Apple will increase its operations.