VOICED : Pistorius case prompts South African

Oscar Pistorius, a renowned double amputee athlete, faces a murder charge for killing his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. The case has shocked fans and raised questions about South Africa's legal system, gun crime, and violence against women. Public opinion has shifted as details emerged during the bail hearing, where Pistorius was granted bail. The case highlights issues of money's influence in justice and broader social problems. The trial will be decided by a judge, reflecting on the country's ongoing soul-searching.

What was the public's initial reaction to Oscar Pistorius being charged with murder?

• They were supportive of the charges.

• They were shocked and in disbelief.

• They were unsurprised.

• They were indifferent.

What did the bail hearing reveal about the incident?

• Pistorius confessed to the crime.

• The case was dismissed due to lack of evidence.

• The incident was a robbery gone wrong.

• Pistorius fired shots through a locked door.

How does the public perceive the influence of wealth on South Africa's legal system?

• Wealth leads to harsher penalties.

• Wealth has no influence.

• Wealth can help one escape legal consequences.

• Wealth ensures a fair trial.

What societal issues does the Pistorius case highlight in South Africa?

• Environmental concerns and pollution.

• Education and literacy rates.

• Gun violence and aggression towards women.

• Economic inequality and unemployment.

How is justice determined in South Africa for cases like Pistorius's?

• By a jury of peers.

• Through a public vote.

• By a judge without a jury.

• By a panel of international judges.