Confusion over the referenda will lead to ‘solicitors’ paradise’

The video discusses the potential for another referendum due to confusion surrounding the current one. It highlights issues with archaic language in the constitution, particularly regarding women's roles. The 'mother in the home' amendment is analyzed, revealing contradictions between government actions and societal realities. The economic pressures on families, such as high rents and mortgages, are emphasized, showing a lack of governmental support for family choices.

What is the main reason for the potential return of another referendum in the near future?

• The public demands more referendums.

• The government wants to change the voting system.

• There is significant confusion surrounding the current referendum.

• The current referendum is too expensive.

What aspect of the constitution is highlighted as needing an update?

• The section on environmental laws.

• The section on women's duties and home responsibilities.

• The section on education reforms.

• The section on economic policies.

What does the 'mother in the home' amendment emphasize?

• Mothers should be forced to work outside the home.

• Mothers should be valued for their work at home and have a choice to work outside.

• Mothers should only work outside the home.

• Mothers should not work at all.

How does the government handle misinformation related to the amendment?

• By banning all discussions about it.

• By supporting misinformation.

• By creating an Electoral Commission to check misinformation.

• By ignoring it completely.

What challenges do families face that force them to work outside the home?

• Abundant job opportunities.

• Free childcare services.

• Low interest rates.

• Exorbitant rents and high mortgages.